Brandon Marshall Has Hip Surgery

Brandon Marshall
Brandon Marshall
For the second consecutive offseason, Brandon Marshall has undergone surgery on his hip. The surgery was considered “minor” according to the Dolphins, and this will not affect his status this coming season. This is good news for keeper leagues, as Marshall owners already have had cause for concern with a change in scenery to Miami, who have had difficulty in their passing game.

The outlook on Marshall is still somewhat uncertain, as he is now coming to a Miami team who have relied heavily on their rushing attack to move the ball, and are led by Chad Henne, who has not had a ton of experience in the league. However, he is coming off a situation in Denver where Kyle Orton was his quarterback and led by a rookie coach, and still managed to put up his third straight 100 catch season.

On the outer surface, Brandon Marshall may not seem to be in an ideal situation: coming offa surgery, going to a new team with a recent history of running the ball, and paired with a quarterback who is still lacking in the experience department. But when looking at it more closely, the situation is a lot better than initially anticipated.

  1. Chad Henne should see drastic improvements going into this season (a large part due to Marshall’s arrival).
  2. The surgery is considered minor, and should not impede on any of his potential this season as an elite fantasy receiver.
  3. The solid running game should be able to open things up for the passing  game, and could greatly benefit Marshall and his fantasy owners.

All in all, the surgery and the move to Miami should not have Marshall owners worried.  Expectations should still be high, and he should still be targeted as an elite receiver.

Are Chris Johnson and Dexter McCluster Twins?

Chris Johnson Dexter McCluster

yep

Is Jamaal Charles worthy of a top pick?

Jamaal Charles
Jamaal Charles is looking to repeat his impressive 2009 season
Coming into the 2009 season, Jamaal Charles had less than 70 carries under his belt, but had put up an impressive 5.3 yards per carry.  Still, playing behind Larry Johnson meant you wouldn’t hear about him at all.  Most casual fans probably didn’t even know who Charles was.  This was the guy who was competing with, and losing to, Kolby Smith for playing time.  Things changed a little bit during the season however, as LJ was sent shipping to Cincinnati, and now the back position was open.  The problem was, nobody knew what Jamaal Charles would do with his opportunity.  Turns out, he took the opportunity and ran with it (get it!?).

The second half of the season saw Charles breakout and become one of the most explosive backs in the league.  He finished the season with 4 consecutive 100 yard games, including a 154 yard performance, as well as a 259 yard performance to close out the year.  He also scored a total of 9 touchdowns (7 rushing, 1 receiving, 1 return) during the final 8 games of the season.  His 5.9 yards per carry were tied for the best in the league with Felix Jones, and .3 yards better than unanimous number one pick Chris Johnson.   Charles’ amazing finish to the 2009 season jumped him into the discussion as to a potential top ten pick, and possibly top five.

Soon after the season ended, and with Thomas Jones available on the market, the Chiefs snatched him up, and Charles fanatics saw the potential for a huge season take a turn for the worse.  With Thomas Jones in the backfield with Charles, carries will now be split.  Charles should get the majority of the snaps, but the addition of Jones, who finished third in rushing yards in the entire NFL, suddenly saw the Kansas City backfield get a little more crowded.  The fantasy potential of Jamaal Charles seemed to drop dramatically.  Also, on draft day, the Chiefs used their second round pick to take Chris Johnson’s doppelganger, Dexter McCluster, the elusive back out of Ole Miss.  While McCluster shouldn’t factor too much into Charles losing carries, it is still somewhat concerning to see the team use a very important pick on another running back.

So with the new turn of events, Charles’s draft stock seems to have taken a hit.  The addition of Jones continues the trend in the NFL of the use of a two back set.  As it becomes more common, and the value of running backs decrease, players like Charles are tough to guage.

So the question remains, is Jamaal Charles worthy of a top pick?

Who’s Number 2?


If you have the first pick in your fantasy football draft, it’s virtually a given who you will take. With Christ (that was a typo, but I’m going to leave it) Johnson’s huge numbers last year, he’s a lock for the top pick. The real fun is going to come with whomever is making the second pick in the draft. There’s always going to be a debate on who the is going to be taken, or who should be taken. At the time of the draft it is hard to say what is right and what is wrong, but there definitely is not a shortage of potential picks that should be considered.

1. Adrian Peterson

AD was the Chris Johnson of 2009; the consensus top pick. He, however, had a very uninspiring season for such a great back. The stats were not awful (1383 yards, 18 touchdowns) but the stat that really jumped out at you was the lack of 100 yard games. We were used to see A-Pete not only rack up 100 yard games, but 200 yard games were not uncommon. However, last year, Peterson went without a 100-yard game in the final 7 games of the regular season, and only had 3 during the year. He also had 7 fumbles (losing 6 of them), which can be a killer during tight fantasy match-ups. Peterson also lost his 3rd down back, Chester Taylor, who helped to take the load off. The biggest question mark, however, may be who will be playing quarterback come September. Brett Favre is pulling his annual yo-yo contest….will he or won’t he? We probably won’t know the answer to that until after training camp, so stay tuned.

Pros: Big play potential, great team, gawdy touchdown numbers, good YAC
Cons: Has a case of fumblitis, lack of 100 yard games in 2009

adrian peterson
Rushing Yards Touchdowns Receiving Yards Touchdowns Fumbles
1383 18 436 0 7


2. Steven Jackson

You have to give S-Jax credit…he comes to play every week (if he physically can). On a struggling team, he never threw in the towel, and played in the most games since the 2006 season. Last year, Jackson finished with 1416 yards, but only hit paydirt 4 times on the ground. The lack of touchdowns is something to be concerned about, because touchdowns can make or break your team. However, touchdowns can come and go from year to year, so it shouldn’t be the most disconcerting stat to look at. Another aspect that makes Jackson so valuable is his ability to catch passes out of the backfield. Last year he had 51 catches for 322 yards. With Sam Bradford now in charge of the offense, he may defer to Jackson early on in his career as he is learning the ins and outs of the league, which could lead to huge numbers again.

Pros: Workhorse, focal point of offense, good pass catcher, good YAC
Cons: Injury prone, rookie QB, lack of big play potential

steven jackson
Rushing Yards Touchdowns Receiving Yards Touchdowns Fumbles
1416 4 322 0 2


3. Ray Rice

Having to overcome a couple of backs ahead of him, Ray Rice not only accomplished that, but he blew right past them. Rice, one of the most dynamic backs in the league, was one of the top players in fantasy last season, and looks to remain there in 2010. The ground numbers were great (1339 yards and 7 touchdowns), but thats just the tip of the iceberg when talking about Rice. His ability to catch passes out of the backfield has been nothing short of outstanding, and the numbers (78 catches, 702 yards, 1 touchdown) prove it. In PPR leagues, depending on how many points catches will get you, Rice could be knocking on the door of the number one pick in many drafts. The addition of Anquan Boldin should help out the passing game, and could open things up a bit more for Rice.

Pros: Huge receiving numbers, solid all-around back, decent touchdown numbers
Cons: 3 fumbles in final 5 games of regular season, could lose carries to McGahee

ray rice
Rushing Yards Touchdowns Receiving Yards Touchdowns Fumbles
1339 7 78 702 3


4. Maurice Jones-Drew

In his first year as the lead dog in the backfield, MJD had a solid 2009 campaign, amassing 1391 yards and 15 touchdowns. He also caught 53 passes for 374 yards and a score from the backfield, further bolstering his bid as a high draft pick. MJD’s low center of gravity makes tackling him such a tremendous feat, and helps him to put up large YAC numbers. On a team that struggles to pass the ball effectively at times, MJD should get a huge number of touches this year again, and could put up impressive numbers.

Pros: Good pass catcher, good YAC, huge touchdown numbers
Cons: Disappeared during a few games last season, underachieving offensive team

maurice jones-drew
Rushing Yards Touchdowns Receiving Yards Touchdowns Fumbles
1391 15 374 1 2

So who is number 2?

Drafting Running Backs Early

It has been a staple of all fantasy football drafts. With your first pick you take the next best available running back. You don’t even think twice, and boom…you’re on to round 2. It’s not until you reach this point in time that you begin to think other positions. Generally there is nothing wrong with taking a running back with your first pick. In fact, if done appropriately, it can help you to win your league. However, with early picks in your drafts, it is not completely necessary to go with the consensus drafting ideology.

It has become so faux pas to take any position but a running back early on, that potentially huge fantasy players are dropping to later picks. Running backs are the meat and potatoes of your lineup and should not be chosen without having done your homework; but that being said, don’t overlook a player just because your buddies will make fun of you and your drafting strategy. Realistically looking at it, you need to be able to field a team that is competitive at every single position. You can draft all the running backs you want, but if you do not surround them with talented fantasy players at other positions, your stud running backs may be offset by your lack of points potential at your other positions.  It is important to remember that having an all-around deep team is the way to win your fantasy league.

Matt Forte
Should Matt Forte garner much attention in the first round?
In most leagues, running backs will generally be able to earn you the most points because of their potential involvement on a huge number of plays.  They not only get carries, but also have the ability to catch passes out of the backfield.  All of these targets push their draft stock up the board.  However, just because they are available, does not mean you have to take them.  There are always fantasy players out there at other positions who end up with better fantasy numbers than running backs.  Looking back historically, Tom Brady had a monster 2007 season, where he threw for 4,806 yards, with 50 TDs and only 8 picks.  These stats helped to vault him to the top of the fantasy rankings across all leagues.  Last year, Drew Brees threw for 5,069 yards and 34 TDs.  These stats suggest that there is some merit to taking quarterbacks in the early rounds.
Recent trends in the NFL have shown that more and more teams are moving to a two-set backfield to help their backs remain fresh, not only for each game, but for the entire 16 game grind, and into the playoffs.  This is allowing more backs the opportunity to get carries week in and week out, and is taking very important carries away from highly drafted fantasy running backs.  The use of more two-set backfields is affecting fantasy football in a few different ways.  Now there are many more running backs that can potentially get you a good number of carries, and get a large number of fantasy points every single week.  This is allowing fantasy owners more flexibility in the way that they draft, because now it is possible to draft a good fantasy point producing running back later on in the draft, which then opens the doors to drafting other positions earlier.  The use of more two-set backfields also leads to the conclusion that, on average, running backs are not as high of a necessity in drafts as they may have been previously.